Popular TVs
Special Limited-Time Offer: Take $1000 OFF now!
Price (65 in)$2,599.99 $1,599.99
Display TypeQLED
TV Resolution4K UHD
Dimensions56.9 x 32.6 x 1.0 inches
See Review
Price (65 in)$2,299.99
Display TypeOLED
TV Resolution4K UHD
Dimensions57.0 x 32.7 x 1.8 inches
See Review
Price (65 in)$3,499.99
Display TypeOLED
TV Resolution4K UHD
Dimensions56.9 x 32.8 x 1.6 inches
See Review
Televisions with a 75-inch screen size are optimal for most average-sized living rooms or other larger rooms. This size offers a better viewing experience in bigger spaces because it takes up more of your field of view, providing a more cinema-like feel. A 75-inch TV is often too large for most bedrooms and dens, so we recommend a smaller screen size for those rooms. Check out our Best 55-inch TVs of 2023 and Best 65-inch TVs of 2023 ratings for great options. For a bigger selection, see our rating of the Best TVs of 2023.
ƒOur Best 75-inch TVs Rating
Compare the Best 75-inch TVs of 2023
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Best 75-inch TVs in Detail
Toshiba Fire TV Edition: If you want to spend as little as possible on a large-screen TV, look no further than the 75-inch Toshiba Fire TV Edition. Retailing for $699.99, it’s $300 cheaper than the next-cheapest TV in our rating, the Sony X80J. You get a lot of TV for the money with the Toshiba Fire TV Edition. That said, average high dynamic range (HDR) performance and a lack of local dimming and variable refresh-rate capabilities make this a better secondary TV. This Alexa-enabled TV is also pretty Amazon-centric. The Toshiba Fire TV edition runs a version of the Android operating system but not Google TV. If you’re looking for a Roku TV experience, the TCL 6-Series (reviewed below) is a good choice.
Samsung QN85A »
Buy at Amazon
Special Limited-Time Offer: Take $552 OFF now!
Price (65 in)$2,199.99 $1,647.95
Display TypeQLED
TV Resolution4K UHD
Dimensions56.9 x 32.6 x 1.0 inches
Samsung QN85A: On the other side of the price spectrum from the Toshiba Fire TV Edition is the Samsung QN85A 4K, which sports the company’s new Neo QLED technology. Neo QLED takes quantum-dot LED’s (QLED) best feature – its brightness – and produces one of the brightest pictures of any TV display. The QN85A’s biggest issue is its mediocre contrast levels. These, combined with the brighter display, make blacks look noticeably gray, according to professional reviews. But local dimming, quantum-dot technology, low screen reflectivity, and good off-angle viewing make this smart TV a solid choice overall. Like all Samsung smart TVs, there’s no Dolby Vision HDR support. HDR is supported via the HDR10 and HDR10+ standards. This TV has one HDMI 2.1 input for more advanced peripherals like an Xbox Series X, and it supports a 120-hertz refresh rate.
Sony Bravia X90J: The outstanding Sony A90J doesn’t come in a 75-inch size, so if you’re looking for a large Sony TV, the Sony Bravia X90J is a great option. While it has a narrower viewing angle and more glare in brightly lit rooms compared to the A90J, professional reviewers still say it’s one of the best midrange smart TVs available. The X90J features outstanding picture quality and color reproduction. While it might not be as bright as the QN85A, it is considerably cheaper. For connecting peripherals, Sony includes two HDMI 2.1 ports on this TV. Like the QN85A, the X90J supports a 120-hertz refresh rate for a smoother picture. It also has a quick response time and low input lag. This 75-TV supports Dolby Vision HDR.
TCL 6-Series: TCL’s QLED TVs offer surprisingly good color reproduction and contrast ratios, considering it costs a fraction of other QLED TVs on the market. Shoppers can choose either Google TV with built-in Google Assistant or Roku TV as a smart-home platform. HDMI 2.1 inputs are included. Professional reviewers didn’t find the operation of the 6-Series as smooth as other smart TVs. But other than a glitchy interface from time to time, reviews of this model are positive. It should be on your short list if you’re looking for a bright, color-rich, and somewhat cheap alternative to Sony and Samsung models.
Sony X80J: Sony’s entry-level 4K TV is the Sony X80J. This 75-inch TV is just $300 more expensive than the Toshiba Fire TV Edition, with far better response time and color reproduction, according to professional reviewers. However, compared to Sony X90J, the picture isn’t as bright, leading to disappointing HDR results. This TV also doesn’t have the greatest contrast ratio, and blacks look gray as a result. While budget-minded shoppers should definitely consider the X80J smart TV over the Toshiba Fire TV Edition, the X90J would be a better buy for most. Unlike its more expensive sibling the Bravia X90J, the X80J only supports a 60-hertz refresh rate.
Samsung Q80A »
Buy at Samsung
Special Limited-Time Offer: Take $801.99 OFF now!
Price (65 in)$1,699.99 $898
Display TypeQLED
TV Resolution4K UHD
Dimensions56.9 x 32.7 x 2.2 inches
Samsung Q80A: The Samsung Q80A 75-inch TV costs as much as some smaller TVs with better picture quality and more features. For example, this smart TV doesn’t have a Neo QLED screen technology like higher-end Samsung QLED models. Still, the display is bright with good colors. While this QLED TV has wide viewing angles, poor contrast ratios make blacks look gray in darker rooms, reviewers say. For $900 less, we’d recommend the TCL 6-Series if you’re looking for a better picture, or opting for the Sony X90J, which is also cheaper than the Q80A. The Q80A doesn’t support Dolby Vision HDR, but it does support HDR10 and HDR10+.
Samsung QN90A »
Buy at Samsung
Special Limited-Time Offer: Take $1000 OFF now!
Price (65 in)$2,599.99 $1,599.99
Display TypeQLED
TV Resolution4K UHD
Dimensions56.9 x 32.6 x 1.0 inches
Samsung QN90A: The Samsung QN90A 75-inch TV is by far the most expensive option in our rating. For the most part, this smart TV is worth the premium price. Professional reviewers laud its bright, colorful picture with mini-LED, full-array local dimming, with some saying it’s the closest you can come to an OLED in a QLED model. While performance is close to the Sony A90J (which retails for $5,999.99 for the 83-inch – there’s no 75-inch option), you lose the great contrast ratio and perfect blacks. That said, the QN90A is far more affordable, which may be the deciding factor for many. As with other Samsung TVs at any screen size, you won’t get Dolby Vision, but this TV does support HDR10 and HDR10+. It also has low input lag and a 120-hertz refresh rate for a good gaming experience.
How Much Does a 75-inch TV Cost?
You can find 75-inch flat screens for as little as $600, but most smart TVs of this size fall between $1,000 and $2,000. Expect to pay between $2,500 and $3,500 for the best 75-inch TVs.
Among the models in our Best 75-inch TV ratings, the cheapest is the Toshiba Fire TV Edition, which retails for $699.99. However, the better performing TVs range between $2,000 and $3,500.
What Size TV Should I Get?
The optimal size TV depends on three main factors: what you watch, the size of your room, and how far away from the TV you sit. Both THX, a company that provides audio/visual standards for movie viewing, and the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE), recommend screen size by how much of your field of view your TV occupies.
THX recommends 40 degrees of line of sight, while SMPTE recommends a more conservative 30 degrees. To calculate the THX recommended size, multiply the distance in inches by .835; for the SMPTE recommended size, multiply by .625. For example, if your TV is about 10 feet from your seating area, the recommended screen size would be:
- THX: 120 x .835 = 100 inches
- SMPTE: 120 x .625 = 75 inches
A 100-inch TV is massive (and expensive), so unless you want the home theater experience, the SMPTE standard should be more than enough for most TV viewers.
What size TV you get also depends on your personal preferences and available space. Here are some additional guidelines:
- Available space: Some rooms don’t have enough space for a large TV. However, remember that screen size is measured diagonally, so you can fit a larger TV in a smaller horizontal area. For example, a 65-inch TV fits in a space about 55 inches wide.
- Resolution: What resolution to choose depends on how close you sit to your TV. Remember that each step up in resolution (720p, 1080p, 4K, 8K) fits more pixels into the display. Thus a 720p or 1080p TV will look fine from a distance but pixelated up close. 4K and 8K TVs don’t have that issue.
- Use: What will you be watching on your new TV? A larger TV is better for movies, video games, and sports. But for smaller rooms or casual viewing, it might be overkill.
- Budget: Your budget will play a significant role. On 75-inch TVs that made our rankings, prices range from as little as $600 to as much as $3,500.
Other things will affect your viewing experience besides picture quality. Audio Video Consultants notes that media source, screen resolution, color accuracy, and display type are also important factors.
Other Guides from 360 Reviews
Our 360 Methodology for Evaluating TVs
Why You Can Trust Us: 48 TVs Researched
At U.S. News & World Report, we rank the Best Hospitals, Best Colleges, and Best Cars to guide readers through some of life’s most complicated decisions. Our 360 Reviews team draws on this same unbiased approach to rate the products that you use every day. To build our ratings, we researched more than 48 TVs and analyzed 18 reviews. Our 360 Reviews team does not take samples, gifts, or loans of products or services we review. All sample products provided for review are donated after review. In addition, we maintain a separate business team that has no influence over our methodology or recommendations.
The following describes our 360 approach to researching TVs to guide prospective consumers.
1. We researched the companies and products people care most about.
U.S. News analyzed and compared a variety of publicly available data, including internet search data, to determine which TVs Americans are most interested in. We found 48 TVs that stand out in terms of volume of searches and research among consumers, as well as across the different rating sources. After conducting a thorough analysis, we were able to condense the initial list to the 10 overall Best TVs. With the companies determined, we conducted a comprehensive research on their features to create a general layout of what consumers should know to assist with their purchasing decisions.
We then compared the available services provided by our top TVs across several criteria, including but not limited to cost, licensing, probability of being on time, customer satisfaction, and flexibility of services. Research shows that these are the most important criteria for people shopping for TVs.
2. We created objective 360 Overall Ratings based on an analysis of third-party reviews.
U.S. News’ 360 Reviews team applied an unbiased methodology that includes opinions from professional reviews as well as consumer reviews.
Our scoring methodology is based on a composite analysis of the ratings and reviews published by credible third-party professional and consumer review sources. The ratings are not based on personal opinions or experiences of U.S. News. To calculate the ratings:
(a) We compiled two types of third-party ratings and reviews:
- Professional Ratings and Reviews. Many independent sources have published their assessments of TVs and their plans. We consider several of these third-party reviews to be reputable and well-researched. However, professional reviewers often make recommendations that contradict one another. Rather than relying on a single source, U.S. News believes consumers benefit most when these opinions and recommendations are considered and analyzed collectively with an objective, consensus-based methodology.
- Consumer Ratings and Reviews. U.S. News also reviewed published consumer ratings and reviews of TVs. Sources with a sufficient number of quality consumer ratings and reviews were included in our scoring model.
Please note that not all professional and consumer rating sources met our criteria for objectivity. Therefore, some sources were excluded from our model.
(b) We standardized the inputs to create a common scale.
The third-party review source data were collected in a variety of forms, including ratings, recommendations, and accolades. Before including each third-party data point into our scoring equation, we had to standardize it so that it could be compared accurately with data points from other review sources. We used the scoring methodology described below to convert these systems to a comparable scale.
The 360 scoring process first converted each third-party rating into a common 0 to 5 scale. To balance the distribution of scores within each source’s scale, we used a standard deviation (or Z-Score) calculation to determine how each company’s score compared to the source’s mean score. We then used the Z-Score to create a standardized U.S. News score using the method outlined below:
- Calculating the Z-Score: The Z-Score represents a data point’s relation to the mean measurement of the data set. The Z-Score is negative when the data point is below the mean and positive when it’s above the mean; a Z-Score of 0 means it’s equal to the mean. To determine the Z-Score for each third-party rating of a company, we calculated the mean of the ratings across all companies evaluated by that third-party source. We then subtracted the mean from the company’s rating and divided it by the standard deviation to produce the Z-Score.
- Calculating the T-Score: We used a T-Score calculation to convert the Z-Score to a 0-100 scale by multiplying the Z-Score by 10. To ensure that the mean was equal across all data points, we added our desired scoring mean (between 0 and 10) to the T-Score to create an adjusted T-Score.
- Calculating the common-scale rating: We divided the adjusted T-Score, which is on a 100-point scale, by 20 to convert the third-party rating to a common 0-5 point system.
(c) We calculated the 360 Overall Score based on a weighted-average model.
We assigned “source weights” to each source used in the consensus scoring model based on our assessment of how much the source is trusted and recognized by consumers and how much its published review process indicates that it is both comprehensive and editorially independent. The source weights are assigned on a 1-5 scale. Any source with an assigned weight less than one was excluded from the consensus scoring model.
Finally, we combined the converted third-party data points using a weighted average formula based on source weight. This formula calculated the consensus score for each product, which we call the 360 Overall Rating.
U.S. News 360 Reviews takes an unbiased approach to our recommendations. When you use our links to buy products, we may earn a commission but that in no way affects our editorial independence.
